Foundations

Start with the roots of attachment theory: where it came from and how the four types map out.

Attachment is not pop psychology — it is a developmental framework with seven decades of research behind it. In this section we start with John Bowlby's "internal working model" and Mary Ainsworth's Strange Situation experiment, then show how the four attachment styles are mapped out and why they reach far beyond romance — shaping how you relate to parents, friends, and colleagues too. A "type" is not a label to hide behind, but a map for knowing yourself. Expect clear, sourced explanations rather than buzzwords, so you can trace any claim back to where it began. We keep the academic jargon out and the practical takeaways in, and if you only read one section of this blog, make it this one.

A Short History of Attachment Theory: From Orphanages to Adult Love
Foundations

A Short History of Attachment Theory: From Orphanages to Adult Love

From Bowlby's wartime orphanage observations to Ainsworth's Strange Situation and Hazan & Shaver bringing attachment into adult love—how the theory came to be.

The Four Attachment Styles, Clearly: Secure, Anxious, Avoidant, Fearful
Foundations

The Four Attachment Styles, Clearly: Secure, Anxious, Avoidant, Fearful

Using two axes—anxiety (fear of loss) and avoidance (fear of engulfment)—this piece lays out all four attachment styles so you can locate yourself and see where to go next.

People and Pets: Why a Furry Companion Can Be a Secure Base
Foundations

People and Pets: Why a Furry Companion Can Be a Secure Base

Attachment isn't only between people. After Bowlby, researchers found stable secure-base bonds can form between people and pets—which explains why losing one hurts so much.

Stop guessing, start understanding

Want to act now? Take the test, then come back to read.

Start Test